Medical Marijuana ProCon.org | HOME | BACK |
|
The distribution of Pro, Con and Neutral sources on our site is illustrated in the charts below. These positions are in response to our core question: "Should marijuana be a medical option now?"
Each has been assigned a theoretical credibility rating ranked by stars (with five being the highest), and they are distributed among the Pro, Con or Neutral sources as follows:
Stars Pro Neutral Con Totals Five 3 51 0 54 Four 37 17 14 66 Three 24 20 6 48 Two 5 51 0 56 One 108 67 42 216 Totals 177 206 62 445
1. Non-Media Organization Sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2. Media Organization Sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Evaluating the credibility of one person's statements against another is difficult if not impossible, especially without knowing each person's background, training, or education.
We have therefore built this credibility ranking chart to help differentiate the theoretical credibility of the various sources on our site. We note however that sometimes, for example, a 1-star source () may be better informed or more credible than even a 5-star () source, and that a 5-star government report or peer-reviewed study can be inaccurate.
The following sets out how we rate sources of the pro/con responses to the question: "Should marijuana be a medical option now?"
Ranking DescriptionReports
Government statistics, reports and peer-reviewed medical studies or articlesKey Experts
Physicians [We believe physicians are the "key experts" in the medical marijuana debate because the issue is thought by many to be ultimately based on the medical value and risks of marijuana, and Physicians, with their training and clinical work, should (at least in theory) have the best knowledge of marijuana's medical value and risks.].Experts
PhD's and JD's (lawyers) with significant post-doctoral involvement in medical marijuana issues; judges who have presided over medical marijuana cases.
Credible Publications
National and international mainstream publications which present unbiased reporting, such as media news (television, radio, internet) and non-profits whose reporting can generally be considered unbiased.
Organization/VIP/Other
Those individuals and organizations actively involved in the medical marijuana debate, but do not fit into the other star categories.Anonymous - Name Withheld by Request
Probably due to the emotional/political/legal nature of this issue, the respondent requested anonymity. To increase the depth of our site we accept anonymous postings, but such postings of course make it impossible to judge a respondent's credibility.We would appreciate your comments on how to make this ranking clearer or more useful.
TOP HOME | BACK